What is our “adult” example teaching?

Are we really adults as we go about bad mouthing, expressing hate, and dissing on each and every move our political leaders make? Why it is families are fair game now? Is there anything that either side can endure about the other today? Can we compromise on anything that comes from a differing ideology?

We teach our children good manners asking them to be appreciative and express themselves with gratitude. Suggest that we don’t tolerate rudeness letting them know in is never acceptable to lash out at another person. Offer that their greatest asset in life will be to become a good listener. Share that life has rules and set boundaries for them where they learn the consequences of decisions. Encourage open-mindedness so the diversity of life can be expressed through varying life experiences. And impart the value of showing respect to elders and those who hold important positions.

Certainly- as this is done we teach them how to think for themselves, create, and find ways to improve the world. That is normal, our thoughts are to enable greatness and build opportunity as this new generation grows into adulthood and leads those who will follow them.

Yet our supposedly adult eyes are closed and ears covered to anything the other side does or says. It seems we stand on platforms of acceptance holding out welcoming hands to all types of diversity; except ideological! What is absurd to me is that we know example is the best teacher. Our education systems are filled with appropriate methods to enable desired outcomes and further learning which is occurring naturally at home. But, what is a child to think when they see how the “adults” of the world destroy any learning that has occurred? Imagine what it would be like for them to learn critical life skills to then see that they mean nothing in the real world today.

My simple hope is that we can practice what we preach and join the youth in what we know to be the basis of acceptance and civility…

Jaren

Share
Posted in Leadership | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Misguided logic of some Outdoor Retailers

Utahns aren’t known to crater to threats or misguided logic. Yes, the Outdoor Retailer Convention was good for our state and many businesses that call Utah home, but having a handful of “industry leaders” voice through ultimatum their view isn’t how we do things here. I acknowledge our leaders for standing with the people on this; that is courage! I witnessed the brash treatment of our legislature as they debated this critical issue. Our elected officials held civility and open minds throughout.

Corporate heads such as Rose Marcario, Todd Spaletto, and Jerry Stritke didn’t have the courage to fly in on their private jets and sit down with Governor Herbert in person. Their bravery was readily apparent as they immediately provided a press release after their conference call. This type of bullying is why we suffer as we do in Washington, but not here in Utah!

I find it ironic that a criticism of Utah’s leaders was that they didn’t listen to the “people.” Guess what Rose, Todd, and Jerry, you have no clue! Your convention participants were interviewed by your organization in August of 2015 with results showing two-thirds of 6,000 retailer attendees and exhibitors want to keep the show in Salt Lake! Call Marisa Nicholson- Vice President and show director for specifics.

Another thing you should learn about Utahns is that we love our outdoors! We are careful stewards of public lands, in fact, I bet no other state does as much. We not only preserve our critical lands but enjoy management behavior that stands out as national leading ideas. This effective use of our land allows for beneficial use throughout a unique diversity of needs. Do you know Utah has 253 conservation projects engaging a commission to aid in continued preservation? We have 43 state parks which in part are funded out of Utah’s general fund, a commitment that goes back to 1957! There are 35 million acres of land open to the public and the country’s largest wildlife conservation project. You could say we are too good at promoting the outdoors as people from all over the world come to see what we have done. I haven’t even mentioned the might five national parks or eight national monuments.

Don’t give credit to Rep Rob Bishop, state and local leaders who were working together with the residents of Utah, yes “locals”—not blinded environmentalists— to preserve and manage the exact same area. With a little luck, and because we didn’t pander to your hysteria; we well may have a Goosenecks State Park soon! Go ahead and believe your alternative facts and internet stories to promote a false agenda. I stand with the leaders who represent the people of Utah who have a rich history of championing good land policy…

Jaren

Share
Posted in Business | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Two unexpected paths cross

Beautiful twin sisters were out late one night with friends. Nothing unusual occurred during the evening, but memories carried were that they all enjoyed each other’s company. Small talk occurred among the group as their vehicle traveled home on a nearly empty city street.

In the same neighborhood, and just over the fence on the street the teens traveled on, a surgeon and his wife had lain down to bed. They too had spent the night with friends perhaps having had similar memories run through their minds.

Suddenly, the couple heard a loud bang followed by crushing sounds of metal moving down the street. Sitting straight up in bed the Doctor suggested to his wife, “There has been a horrible accident; I must go see what I can do to help!”

He was right, the teen driver had lost control, and in an effort to correct course his car slid into its side beginning to flip. The teens weren’t speeding, but on a street with a speed limit such that it caused the vehicle to roll repeatedly as it gradually came to a stop in the middle of the street. As the car rolled, two of the passengers were thrown from the vehicle while the others tossed and turned inside hearing breaking glass and realizing crushing blows.

First on the scene was a woman who was traveling just seconds behind the car. As she walked onto the scene—somewhat in shock—the physician came running up to the car in a bathrobe and slippers. His natural instinct kicked in as he began to perform triage on the situation. What he saw was a car containing teens that seemed confused, but appeared to need less medical attention then the two who were outside the car lying on the pavement. He knew the escape of the trapped teens would need to be facilitated, but wanted desperately to check on the others first. He kindly suggested to the woman, “I feel it is important that I check on these other people first.” As he raised his arm pointing in the direction of those who had flown from the car, “I need to see if their needs are greater. It is important that we get all these people out quickly as you can see there is a fire building near the gas tank. Can you do that please?”

With that he fled to the others finding that they had received terminal injuries. This only took minutes as he then hurried back to assist the woman he had left temporarily. As he approached the car, he saw that she had helped everyone out but one. She yelled to him as he neared “there is one girl who is trapped” asking for his help. The only thing he could do was to crawl in the car with her to see what could be done. Once inside, he found that her hand was caught between the pillar and the doors window frame. He was nervous about the ensuing fire, yet wanted to help in a way not to do further damage her fear filled body.

He spoke with the young woman finding she had calmed in his presence. He suggested he was there to help, asking if there was any further bodily harm she was aware of he couldn’t see. Nothing was noted other than the unfathomable shock and fear that engulfed her. After hearing this, the doctor began working on freeing her hand. It was clearly crushed in a fashion making it nearly impossible to remove. He tried to comfort her as he tried different ways to help. At this point the fire had increased to the point of smoke making visibility and communication difficult between the two. He knew time was limited for both of them as fuels could easily combust without notice. The best option for survival was to apply full pressure to remove the hand at what could be high cost (potential loss of fingers or damage to the hand), but far less then another loss of life. “You need to trust me” were his next words, “I need to pull your hand with all my might to free you and it will be very painful!” To his surprise she said, “Go ahead, I am ready.” He felt as if she were closing her eyes as she spoke these words, but he couldn’t see. What he did know for certainty was that her courage was significant.

What happened next may be the first noticeable miracle of the night. As he pulled, after having tried many different ways with slightly less pressure, the hand slipped out and they were free. Just as both climbed out of the car, it blew into flames to become nothing more than black melted piles of what was once a car.

After the accident, the physician reached out to the brave young lady asking to see her in her hospital room. Once there he asked the family if he could meet with her personally. They had no idea what he wanted, but being so grateful for his heroism they obliged willingly. As he entered her room—after both subconsciously recounted there experience together—his first words were, “thank you for saving my life.” She sat bewildered believing it was he who saved her life so she was confused. You see it was her twin sister was one of the two who lost their lives that night, so she was particularly sensitive to his life saving actions. She remembered when they both stood in amazement at the car engulfed in flames just seconds after they arose from the entrapment.

Why do you say that? She asked sincerely. Well, I had made myself a promise that I would stay in the car with you no matter the outcome. When I asked you if I could your hand free, I knew that if you said no, we would meet a certain death. Your bravery saved us that night; thank you! She then quietly asked “do you know how my hand freed so easily?” No, but I do believe in miracles. It may be we simply received a tender mercy. Whatever it was; it saved our lives.

Not many of us can imagine the pain this young woman, her family, or friends must have experienced. Her loss is beyond words; her survival is a miracle as described by the doctor. This miracle may have never happened if this service minded physician didn’t offer help. Did her sister play a role in the rescue? I have hope she did.

Yet as in any hardship, there is a lesson in this story we can learn from. Intense grief can’t be broken down by words alone; it is through shared grief healing occurs, which then makes our words significant. Reach out to those in need, particularly grief stricken, and brokenhearted. Hold out a hand of love, offer a comforting embrace of compassion, shed a tear of common sorrow. Over time wisdom will transform pain into understanding, but for now support is needed. God bless this family who is surrounded by love during this difficult time.

Jaren

Share
Posted in Life | Leave a comment

Great story from a favorite show…

Share
Posted in Life | Leave a comment

Our Electoral College is outdated?

I am intrigued and gratified by the outcries of victory (and/or defeat) from the 2016 election results. Intrigued- that we are quick to find answers which support our side and Gratified- that we live in a country where it is okay to differ.

Why am I intrigued? If both sides can’t be right; then neither is wrong. What gives then? We must be bringing our individual perspectives to how we view the world. What if we could place ourselves in someone else’s shoes?  I suggest we can do this by looking internally first. Do we pick the side of justice we stand on even as the currents of change alter direction?  I might ask myself: was I okay with the findings of the FBI as the email issues were dismissed to then be frustrated when they were opened again? To then be happy they were dismissed a second time… What changed? Nothing more than the side that was thought to be harmed. This is one of many examples we can use to see how our decisions are made. I am as guilty as the next in allowing some partiality into my thought processes.

Where I typically come to terms with my bias is when someone I respect shares a differing opinion and I listen. The other night I was discussing the failure of leadership in what was being displayed in the WikiLeaks emails. A question was asked of me, “Do you think the pains of disclosures would be limited to one group?” Knowing the sincerity of the person asking—I dug into my heart—and realized no; they certainly are not. I too know that we have very good—often well founded—reasons for our views. Not one of us has the exclusive on knowledge nor are we readily able to see the unintended consequences of decisions. This is why collective thought (often incorporating the life experiences of others who have lived differently than us) and concession creates the greatest good. We are at our best when all sides are considered, debate taken, and compromises made.

Is there a protection in our Constitution against our selfish desires? I argue the Electoral College may be a critical tooldecisions wisely selected to shelter us from ourselves.

We are a Republic not a Democracy. A Republic is a form of government where power sits within the elected leaders who are chosen to represent the citizens. A Democracy is rule of the majority. I think our founders wanted to protect against “majority rule” knowing the likely results would be that power would then reside in populated regions (large metropolitan areas). The Electoral College is merely one safeguard against this; the other is the Senate (arguably the Supreme Court as well). Each state is granted a voice where Montana has footing in elections even though California has nearly 37.9 times more citizens. For me it is not a leap of faith to suggest someone who has issues with the Electoral College, then has by default a problem with the Senate as well. It too may have been established in our founding fathers belief that one day large groups could be mobilized through persuasion (good or bad depending on the view) by tools such as the media.

The separation of power isn’t limited to representation but includes three branches of government and states’ rights. Our success in maintaining balance and support in the voice of the people is satisfied among other things through the Electoral College. Presidential candidates seek the backing of the entire nation providing consistency in our country. Imagine the arguments we would be having if only the votes of the coastal areas mattered.

If our founders wanted a Democracy they could have created one.  To change a critical protection provided in our Constitution against becoming anything short of a Republic  is the Electoral College; I say keep it!

If you have issues; please ask yourself if it is the result of the election or at least argue the value of changing our form of government which has proven itself to the world…

Jaren

Share
Posted in Leadership | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

It is best we don’t agree…

I was impressed with President Obama reaching out to Trump welcoming a healthy transition of leadership. “The peaceful transfer of power is one of the hallmarks of our democracy.” Secretary Clinton was graceful in defeat and suggested our constitutional democracy demands our participation. I agree and suggest this advice makes for our greatness. We all must continue to do our part…

For me, the significance of life is found in being fully engaged in activities. The best undertakings for our well-being are found when we utilize our individual characteristics and invest them in something larger than ourselves. Our experiences—exaggerated by dreams—carried on faith and filled with hope can either succeed or fail. Either outcome eventually satisfies our inner soul because happiness can only be fully understood through loss. The joy of success is sweetened if one has felt the agony of defeat.

Our country has just experienced what has been described as one of the ugliest, hardest fought elections in our history. Well over 120,000,000 citizens took to the ballot box and exercised their right. Many of us were fully engaged requiring great mental and physical strength. We carried passion about our cause wanting to endure what many times felt like an impossible mission.

Emotions were larger-than-life as we failed to see why others (most often friends and family) could be so oblivious to what we knew to be true and felt in our hearts. Stories were overstated, feelings hurt, and our ability to listen stifled. Yet we maintained diligence in efforts to accomplish what we believed in which is healthy.

At the end of the day; some of us lost the battle. This emotion, like others in life sits low in the stomach. We walk in a somber state carrying in our hearts a suffocating feeling as if all hope has been lost. I know this feeling both from historical national campaigns and on a personal level having run for office. It sucks!

Today, as I sit in my office rejoicing in the outcome, I innocently look to my wall where I arnoldhave hanging a painting titled “The Prayer at Valley Forge” by Arnold Friberg. My heart immediately turns to those on the other side who may be heavy with sorrow as I realize—like George Washington—I can turn in prayer for the relief and support of my fellow beloved citizens and our country. It is every one of you great and wonderful people that have given me perspective, allowed me an opportunity to share my view, and who with me can build on the rich history of our great nation. President Washington considered it an indispensable duty to solicit the help of the Almighty. I too find comfort in kneeling in prayer at this critical time in our countries history.

Friends, I pray for your comfort. I pray that we will put the passion of the election behind us and reunite as citizens. I pray that we will build strength from our differences realizing unmet dreams, carried by faith and filled with hope for a better day!

It is together we have made this country great; it is together we will continue building on this rich heritage…

 

Jaren

Share
Posted in Leadership | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Is the Republican Party dead?

We can find nearly any opinion/evidence/support we are looking for to validate our ideals. I have made reference before about a game situation where my brother-in-law and I sat side by side watching the same play where a penalty was called. He cheered for my team’s rival. While I felt the ref had seen the play correctly, he was beside himself complaining about how unfair the call was. This was for me first hand evidence of how our persuasions lead us to see the same thing differently. I could find all the reasons the call was right while he objected by adding his perspective.

In this election cycle some are saying the Republicans may not survive as others suggest the strength will be shown through the silent majority. Regardless, it is my hope that we will be able to learn from the outcome.

Trump has been called a populist candidate. Over the last 60 years Nixon and Reagan were populist candidates. They too rode the wave against the establishment as outsiders. Nixon was carried by the silent majority’s antagonism toward social disorder and Reagan “Stagflation” (Bush 41 won on coattails and Bush 43 is argued to have won through the Supreme Court). The term populist strikes me a little odd as populism means the people which is what we want– isn’t it?. This is how Republican candidates win elections; through a populist vote.

Ok, suggest the Democrats receive a populist vote as well. My arguement is that Democrats have built-in constituencies who favor expanding government benefits and/or are targeted by perceived unfair treatment. Ask yourself why they really want open borders? Do ethnic minorities have targets on their backs along with other circumstances which favor voter blocs such as LGBTQ’s, Unions, and Women? There are other examples but these give you the idea. In any election, Democrats have a built in constituency which guarantees them an election if the “populist” voters don’t show.rep

Think of this:

Democrats portray themselves as supporters of these blocs, but who are they really?

  • Trail of Tears-Indians tormented forced to relocate- first Democrat President Andrew Jackson
  • Democrat party’s pro-slavery faction secedes after Lincoln is elected leading to Civil War
  • KKK created by Democrat Nathan Bedford Forrest-first Grand Wizard
  • The Palmer Raids- Woodrow Wilson set out to arrest Americans who weren’t loyal to the Government
  • Democrats filibuster a Republican measure to stop lynching
  • Japanese Internment Camps- Democrat Franklin Roosevelt’s executive order
  • Bay of Pigs Kennedy didn’t give air support to militia to overthrow Castro
  • Democrat George Wallace- Inaugural Adress-“segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever”
  • Chappaquiddick- Ted Kennedy left Mary Jo Kopechne suffocating in his car as he plotted how to reveal the news
  • Iranian Hostage Crisis- Jimmy carter’s failed rescue attempt
  • Bill Clinton- turned down Sudan’s offer to extradite Osama Bin Laden before 9/11
  • Obama- America loses its AAA credit rating for the first time in history

Republicans in fact are better supporters of the Democrats voting blocs but aren’t out patting themselves on the back. Perhaps a mistake…

  • Emancipation Proclamation- first Republican President Abraham Lincoln issued an order to free all slaves
  • End of Civil War- Lincoln reunites country after guiding the north to victory
  • Women’s right to vote- Republican Senator Sargent with Susan B Anthony and Elizabeth Stanton introduce text for 19th Amendment
  • First Woman elected to US House- republican Jeannette Rankin
  • Republican owner Branch Rickey brought Jackie Robinson in the MLB breaking the “color” barrier
  • Civil Rights Act- GOP overcomes a five day filibuster by Senate Democrats
  • Condi Rice first black woman to ever be Sec of State under George W Bush
  • Balanced Budget (1998-2001)- Republican congress against unenthusiastic Bill Clinton

Trump won the nomination over 16 other candidates; he has inspired astounding enthusiasm among the middle class. He has the Establishment along with the Democrats and Media suggesting he is anything but worthy, yet remains a viable option. I for one don’t want the Republicans to change who we are—democracy it is about the people—not the politian’s careers.

My party has faults but will survive regardless of the outcome of this election. It is the safe harbor reserved for “the people” when critical change is needed… It is when tipping points are reached the masses come out in number which well may be happening this year…

Jaren

Share
Posted in Business | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Her plan- won’t work

For all you voters who are supporting Clinton with hopes she will come to your aid; please think again. Her portrayal of helping the middle class while sticking it to the rich is a hoax!

If today you earn $0-$18,450 your rate is 10%, under Clinton you can earn $100 more at this rate. Thank you for the gift for those of us between $18,450 and $18,550. This trend continues up to $5MM with each rate remaining the same with slight differences in the bracket like in the example above. Those over $5MM move from 39.6% to 43.6%. Way to stick it to the rich HRC…

Today our capital gains tax rates are 20% (15% for long term gains- those investments held hillary2_1over a year). Under Clintons plan the rate begins at 39.6% for years 1-2, 35% 2-3, 32% 3-4, 28% 4-5, 24% 5-6 and long term which is all over 6 years 20%. But she also adds 4% surtax on amounts over $5MM. Example a family sells a stock they bought for an investment. Say they made $10,000 in the first year. Their tax goes from $2,000 to $3,960, or after three years from $1,500 to $3,200. This is a 51% and 47% increase in tax. I use small numbers intentionally. Think of real estate transactions with larger amounts or businesses with millions invested. What she fails to understand (I know-she has no business experience and is a career politician-not a good excuse) is that people and businesses prepare for expenses which include tax rates. There are only two things that will happen: 1- no one will sell until we correct the madness and 2- values will decrease. The market is changed negatively under her plan with wealth stifled at all levels. Candidate Clinton- tax receipts come from an upwardly mobile economy…

This may seem good to the naive, “Oh let’s raise taxes…we will get higher tax receipts,” but it doesn’t work! Know that whoever was thinking of selling with a tax cost of 20% will not entertain doing the same at 43.6% (an increase of a 218%)? People- either get selling assets now—just in case the madness carries out—or vote against this plan.

In case the above didn’t catch your attention: Let’s say you own a farm, your parents pass, and you with your siblings want to continue on with the family business. Today you can do so but with a tax obligation of 40% for value over $10.9MM. Under the fabulous Clinton plan designed to stick it to the rich while bringing new found wealth to the middle class, you will be asked to pay 45% at a lower threshold of $7MM. This family pays an additional $1,560,000 at the time a $10,9MM asset passes down to the children. Please, tell me how many farming families can afford this? All that is wanted is to continue the family business…

PS- the other team wants to end the death tax. Now that is what I call supporting the middle class…

(Fact check me please- I want a good debate)

Jaren

Share
Posted in Business | Tagged | Leave a comment

Global warming- my simple view

I am not a scientist nor do I claim to fully understand, but I do care enough to have a basic knowledge. Please, where I am wrong address it with me; that is how I learn…

I was asked in a fb post whether or not I believe in global warming: This is my answer

Global temperature changes have occurred throughout the history of our planet. We don’t melting-earth_climate-change_thomas-vogel_gettyimages-157581491-1024x607need to go back as far as the ice age to see the extreme fluctuations that have occurred. Greenland was cut off by ice from 1410 to 1720 as glaciers advanced in the Alps. There was a “little” ice age from 1650-1850. And then in 1973 some scientists believed the globe was cooling. In an attempt to address the issue Carter asked that we melt the polar ice caps to avoid the loss of agricultural production and run out of food by the 1990’s. I will agree this came about as there was a slight trend downward in temperatures from the 1940’s through the 1970’s and that science now has much more accurate equipment today, but fact is we had warnings.

This early and possibly inaccurate portrayal of science, by political figures, is why some wonder today if there is a political agenda at play. Carter also suggested we were running out of oil which was followed years later by Clinton. With the technology science enjoys today, we not only can see an upward trend but can test sea levels and take pictures of the ice caps from space.

So the question is the amount of human contribution to either cycle the earth is going through at any given time in history. The suns energy warms the earth through the light passing into our atmosphere. The heat then radiates upward as it escapes but when “greenhouse” gases exist—in higher than normal conditions—the heat is radiated back again to the surface warming our planet yet again. The earth sustains an average temperature of 59 degrees which is termed life-supporting. Some warming is directly related to output from the sun which varies slightly but not enough that life has been threatened or lost.

The components that affect greenhouse gases are: Carbon dioxide, Chlorofluorocarbons, Methane, Nitrous oxide, and Water vapor. Of these, water vapor is the most abundant gas. Unfortunately as the temperature rises this gas increases naturally and is where we get the noticeable changes in precipitation. Carbon dioxide (Co2) is the place most of the discussions lay and politicians popularize our ability to make a difference. Fact is, Co2 plays a minor role and there are factors outside our control that build the Co2 levels. Yes burning fossil fuel plays a part, but a minor part of a minor part. Please remember we exhale this gas as we breathe. Volcanoes and forest fires are the biggest contributors. It has been a little time since I studied this but from memory several individual volcanoes over history have contributed more Co2 then mankind throughout all history. We can’t stop this natural phenomenon– which is fine–but the second largest contributor is fire. Think with me about the fires that burn out west and how they fill the atmosphere in the Salt Lake Valley; even when they are in another state. We no longer manage our forests by removing the dead woods. When the natural process of re vegetation occurs in the forest; fires clear where man could have helped. It has become unpopular to manage. Do you know that after a logging company has taken trees for lumber the forest vegetation is increased 20% and more? Our science hasn’t just improved in reading global warming but on ways we can assist Mother Nature in the vegetation of her forests. I support doing more with fossil fuels, energy efficiency is critical for more reasons beyond global warming, but it can’t be all we do or at the expense of reason.

For the other gases: Chlorofluorocarbons- these are industrial and commercial applications that are no longer in use or regulated. Methane- this is the funny one that farmers have to deal with, in particular cow/dairy farmers. Other producers are landfills and agriculture. This gas is more active in causing negative effects then Co2 but is less abundant/relevant.  Nitrous oxide- organic fertilizers (don’t tell the naturalists), biomass burning, some from fossil fuel, and acid production each contribute.

I hope you ask why I know this. I supported a friend who tried to get a clean burning coal fired power plant approved. I will tell you science does not matter on this issue! His process which was worked on in conjunction with some of our finest scientists at USU was able to leave the environment better then they found it. They took emissions and ran them through and algae leaving no footprint whatsoever. It finally got approved but delays in lawsuits from environmentalist who didn’t even know what they were doing delayed to the point of exhaustion; sadly the goal.

We can do better, I want to be part of helping, but we can’t label specific industries alone which are designed to fulfill political agendas…

Jaren

Share
Posted in Business | Tagged | 1 Comment

An uneducated deplorable

cartoonSunday rant from an uneducated deplorable: I have friends (intentionally left unnamed but they know who they are) who amuse me endlessly. They spew hate and misguided information about the Presidential race perpetuating the media and establishments partial portrayals of history. They never check sources, and I bet they don’t even fully read the fake web articles they find and share. When either me or a commenter replies with the “real story” they dig into another untruth with no response to the first. If ever asked why one should vote for their candidate they never—no not once—ever give an answer.

Bernie had a following which may be described best by Forrest Gump- stupid is as stupid does. Why am I so critical? Robin Hood as we know stole from who he felt had surplus giving to those those he felt were in need. In these “robberies,” individuals were hurt but forrestno one is robbed perpetually because they set up barriers. In business, if the government takes from those they deem to have surplus; this isn’t a single unplanned event. Those companies then need to address the cost: raise prices, stop production, or find a new place to do their services. Free tuition and healthcare caught on with Millennials. Bernie had a loyal following; they don’t know the consequences. The DNC teamed up with Clinton to defeat him but knew they too needed a giveaway to both keep these voters and solicit new.

Emails were found (yes not all are missing and more are coming) suggesting Clinton felt Bernie followers were blindly supporting but that they needed something to draw them in. To me, she is about finding voting blocks; not whole country solutions. Think of some: $15 minimum wage, and corporate profit sharing. Great dream for sure, but who pays? It is easy and popular to say the rich as in the Robin Hood story but not realistic. No one gets mad when the “rich” are robbed. They are those “other” people, perhaps even deplorable… yet it is they who are critical to any vibrant economy.

A friend who I will name, Mike Holmstrom because he is exceptionally bright, fair minded, once Republican, and I believe current Clinton supporter shared an idea. He offers Trump supporters have a psychological problem. In reading about it, oddly I find it describes verbatim the majority of the anti Trump group who then by default are Clinton supporters.

Here goes: nearly all Clinton supporters are dealing with a critical psychological ill known as the “Dunning-Kruger” effect — put very simply, when stupid people don’t know that they are stupid — in action.

Example: Why is it some think Clinton won the debate? Well experience could be a benefit for sure but maybe one candidate is a machine and the other a reasoning human willing to go off his insight. Clinton had great one liners memorized to the point they were both robotic and often stated off topic leaving those who truly listened wondering. Is it odd to anyone she can’t remember a thing when asked by the FBI but can remember everything Trump has done for 30 years? It was reassuring to me Donald was simply answering the questions even forcing the moderator to uncover his obvious biases.

But go on Trump hating friends, say Donald hates women because he called individuals like Rosie names or defended Miss Universe to be portrayed as name calling by Clinton. I’m sure glad we don’t hold everyone to this standard. Imagine every person who got mad at another calling them a name to be then be called a bigot toward all that individual represented. Recently a friend said in a rant Donald has a “porn star” immigrant wife. cartoon1Wow- I mean WOW laughing at who the potential first man would be. Why is Ivanka Trump asked about her father yet Chelsea isn’t? And if Trump didn’t pay taxes and/or declared bankruptcy. These are our laws which incidentally are there to encourage entrepreneurs to take the risk and build business. Is this really that hard to understand? This is where the jobs are and the hope of a better day.

I gave this answer to the question as to why anyone with intelligence would vote for Trump:

Trump is a man of singular political courage. At least he is willing to defy the rhetoric of the establishment and the mainstream media. They unjustly describe him as anti-American for daring to voice ideas and opinions that when listened to make a lot of sense.

Donald Trump is ridiculed mercilessly for saying, “Make America Great Again” or “America First.” This action against government whether here or abroad isn’t old fashioned (I hope)! It is directed to the well being of our country which means each of us. This idea represents the wisdom of our founders; it is our tradition.

A clear vision following this courage is what history has shown made our country “great!” This will not only benefit each of us as its citizens, but prove trumpthumb1yet again to be the beacon on the hill providing hope to the world. We shouldn’t ever be embarrassed for having faith or living with hope.

Yes, I am conservative. No, I am not so dogmatic that I think the Republicans have all the answers, but in this race the choice is clear. The promises made to obtain your vote are unfounded and—if an attempt to reach them were enabled—our country will suffer.

No, my response isn’t about years of lies, emails, Benghazi, the Clinton years or a foundation defying all Clinton seems to hate, but a fear we cannot survive what her ideas would do to our collective well-being…

Jaren

Share
Posted in From friends | Leave a comment